Friday, January 6, 2012
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Identify potential hazards in the workplace.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Potential hazards are correctly identified and removed, reduced or reported in terms of own level of authority/capacity.
You need to identif the hazzerd by wat hapend wat is it that is sespieses then report it as fast as posebel.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Instructions relating to exposure to dangerous substances and hazards in the workplace are known and an explanation is given as to why they pose a potential threat to the work environment.
You need to now how you need to triet the hazzerds sapstens and then troe the rest of the work plas and then to deleget to the workers.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. The kinds of work that require protective clothing are identified and protective clothing is used according to legal requirements.
Wen working whit cemiekels and mesienerie that is dangeris you need to wer saftie cloting.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
4. Health and safety instructions are followed in situations that require lifting and handling of materials.
You need to do wen yiou get to tel wat to doe so that you doent get hert and sou that your colieks don’t get hert.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
5. The importance of each employee being vigilant and reporting hazards and violations of health, safety and security procedures is known and understood with reference to a possible chain of events that could result from not reporting a violation.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Know how to limit damage to persons or property in the event of an accident or emergency.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. The location of fire extinguishers, hoses and alarms is known in a selected work context.
You need to now wer the tings is sou if tings happens you can react kwieklie.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. The difference between the different kinds of fire extinguishers in the building is identified and the use for each is identified correctly.
You need to now wat exstingweser is uosd for wat and y it is uosd for that fire.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. The use of a fire extinguisher is demonstrated competently.
You need to be soun hoe to uos the fire exstingwiser and sou that you can anderstand cleerlie.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
4. Established procedures relating to the identification of fires and other emergencies are known and followed promptly and correctly in an emergency.
You need to be trand how to handel a sitoehasen of a fire and wat to do in difrent sitoehasons.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
5. Dangerous occurrences are identified and accurately and timeously reported according to established policy.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6
6. Injuries involving individuals are reported promptly to the relevant authority.
You need to be trand hoe to handel ingeries on the sat .
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7
7. Reasons are given to explain why it is the responsibility of every employee to maintain the safety and security of a selected work environment.
You need to now that your one life is your responsebeletie.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Know how to contribute to the maintenance of security in the workplace.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Security procedures are known and followed competently.
You need to noew the prosegers and hoe to uos them.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Security risks are identified and actions taken to deal with security risks that are within limits of own authority.
You need to take aksons and stand up agesns thr rong aksons.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. Potential security risks outside own authority are identified and reported using familiar and established procedures.
You need to see the riska and report them and take akson.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
4. Suspicious behaviour is noted and action is taken within own level of authority.
You need to see the suspieses aksons and then whit the nolige you have handel it.
Demonstrate to the health, safety and security of the workplace.
Investigate the advantages and disadvantages of working in a team or group.
Reasons why people work together in teams or group.
Situations in own environment where working in a team.
The characteristics of an effective team or group.
Behaviors and attitude.
Communication is very important.
Problem solving.
If you are working in a group you must know how to work with other, listening to every ones opinion and discuss what the right answer is. Don't discriminate.
Investigate the advantages and disadvantages of working in a team or group.
Reasons why people work together in teams or group.
Situations in own environment where working in a team.
The characteristics of an effective team or group.
Behaviors and attitude.
Communication is very important.
Problem solving.
If you are working in a group you must know how to work with other, listening to every ones opinion and discuss what the right answer is. Don't discriminate.
Thursday, January 5, 2012
FAUNA
SO1
As1 FAISHING NETS,MISTNETS ,CAGES,FIREARMS
As2you need to manetaen uor tools sou that the tools doent get hert and u can uose properlie.
As3 you need to mantane. You needto do ifesent work. And that you can be suksesfoel.
So2
As1 you need to select tools and ekwipment you will uos.
As2 volou legal aspeks.Sou it can be suksesfoul in the end.
As3You need to surets for the apropriet monietoring meterd.
So3
AS1You need to prouses your data so the informason to be sorted.
As2Your informaso needs to be stord and recorded .
As3You need to spesefay the data.
As4 report to the maniement.
SO4
As1 the reports needs to be on paper and verbelie.
As2You need to take the limets in consederason.
FLORA
SO1
Ac1 stems,secelbos,inkbesie
Ac2 problem plants ,maps ,keywards
Ac3 fruis, realton,cauch quuss
Ac4frent feat and veters or her
SO2
Ac1 mechanicul, biolaical , chemical
Ac2 sekelbos biglograal usng of maps
Ac3rit eguipment fuly tvainetl staff
Ac4carrid out to haelthand safety
So3
Ac1water ,ohs
Ac2 Eheckiry jup on them
Ac3supqerhsen
Sunday, January 1, 2012
maps.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Read, interpret and use maps.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
An appropriate map type is selected as it applies to the terrain and the purpose for use.
Wen the map is selected for the job thy ferst need to desad wat erie thy gone work in and wer it is loekated and then piek a map from that spesefie eria.thy woed then desad on wat tap of map will thy toes Cadastral, relief, road map, vegetation maps, census data maps, distribution maps.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Cadastral, relief, road map, vegetation maps, census data maps, distribution maps.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The user is orientated to the map using compass points (such as true and magnetic north).
Wen usen a map thy woe duos a compest whet it an thy woed use the true and magnetic north whit the compast wael thy worek whet the compest.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Real locations, distances, areas and relative positions are identified through the use of map reading and interpretation of information.
Wen working whit a map and a spesefiek loekasen all the termenalegiSymbols such as roads, powerlines, railways, rivers, beacons, Scale, (for example. 1:50,000); Measurements (e.g. distance and area); Co-ordinates (e.g. GPS and/or six-figure grid references, etc.) Triangulatione wod be uosd whit it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Symbols such as roads, powerlines, railways, rivers, beacons, Scale, (for example. 1:50,000); Measurements (e.g. distance and area); Co-ordinates (e.g. GPS and/or six-figure grid references, etc.) Triangulation.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Map errors and shortcomings are identified and corrected in accordance with industry norms and standards.
Problems can ouker on the map thy woed weriefay it and the thy woed report the problem and try to fieksit.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Roads, boundaries, firebreaks, rivers, vegetative species distribution, grid-squares.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Contour lines are interpreted and explained in accordance with industry standards.
Wen doen thes speseviek job thes needs to be takn in to consederason Aspect; elevation; topography.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Aspect; elevation; topography.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Read, interpret and use maps.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
An appropriate map type is selected as it applies to the terrain and the purpose for use.
Wen the map is selected for the job thy ferst need to desad wat erie thy gone work in and wer it is loekated and then piek a map from that spesefie eria.thy woed then desad on wat tap of map will thy toes Cadastral, relief, road map, vegetation maps, census data maps, distribution maps.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Cadastral, relief, road map, vegetation maps, census data maps, distribution maps.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The user is orientated to the map using compass points (such as true and magnetic north).
Wen usen a map thy woe duos a compest whet it an thy woed use the true and magnetic north whit the compast wael thy worek whet the compest.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Real locations, distances, areas and relative positions are identified through the use of map reading and interpretation of information.
Wen working whit a map and a spesefiek loekasen all the termenalegiSymbols such as roads, powerlines, railways, rivers, beacons, Scale, (for example. 1:50,000); Measurements (e.g. distance and area); Co-ordinates (e.g. GPS and/or six-figure grid references, etc.) Triangulatione wod be uosd whit it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Symbols such as roads, powerlines, railways, rivers, beacons, Scale, (for example. 1:50,000); Measurements (e.g. distance and area); Co-ordinates (e.g. GPS and/or six-figure grid references, etc.) Triangulation.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Map errors and shortcomings are identified and corrected in accordance with industry norms and standards.
Problems can ouker on the map thy woed weriefay it and the thy woed report the problem and try to fieksit.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Roads, boundaries, firebreaks, rivers, vegetative species distribution, grid-squares.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Contour lines are interpreted and explained in accordance with industry standards.
Wen doen thes speseviek job thes needs to be takn in to consederason Aspect; elevation; topography.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Aspect; elevation; topography.
SPESEMENTS
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Required specimens are collected; data obtained and/or prepared using prescribed methods and procedures.
The choice of the many methods for collecting fishery data will depend on the variables to be measured, the source and the resources available. In many cases, there is a natural way to collect particular variables. For example, relatively static variables, like vessel length or engine size, are often best collected through a registration system. Highly dynamic variables, like catch or effort, may often be best obtained through daily records, such as logsheets.
For the same variable, the methods can be different depending on the type of fishery. For example, for a large-scale fishery, catch data would be best collected from logbooks, whilst in a small-scale fishery interviews and/or questionnaires would often be the best method. The sources (fishers, processors etc.) are also an important factor for the choice and design of methods. Buyers, processors and other intermediaries are likely to keep their own sales records, which should be used as the basis of data forms. Small-scale fishers often do not keep any records, and data acquisition in this case would be restricted to one-to-one interviews, but the interview structure could be more flexible.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Records and relevant data are kept of the precise location where the specimens were collected.
Wen dthe data is colekted the data needs to be kep saf in A FAEL AND FOR A LONG PERED OF TAM SO RIESOTS CN BE DON ON THAT DATA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Required environmental data is recorded using appropriate methods and equipment.
Registration: registers and licences are particularly valuable for complete enumeration, but are limited to variables that change slowly, such as numbers of fishing vessels and their characteristics.
• Questionnaires: forms which are completed and returned by respondents. An inexpensive method that is useful where literacy rates are high and respondents are co-operative.
• Interviews: forms which are completed through an interview with the respondent. More expensive than questionnaires, but they are better for more complex questions, low literacy or less co-operation.
• Direct observations: making direct measurements is the most accurate method for many variables, such as catch, but is often expensive. Many methods, such as observer programmes, are limited to industrial fisheries.
• Reporting: the main alternative to making direct measurements is to require fishers and others to report their activities. Reporting requires literacy and co-operation, but can be backed up by a legal requirement and direct measurements.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Tree diameter, prevailing weather condition, and photographs taken.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
A review is given of what constitutes ethical collecting practices.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Live specimens are released in area of origin where transportation and additional data collection is not required. Wen that happens seten permieson and dokoments needs to be werievad and it mast be aproefed first befor that can happen.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Package specimens safely for transportation.
Wen you need to Package specimens safely for transportation you need to weriefay wat metord is gone be used and if that metord is safe for the animal or not.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Required specimens are collected; data obtained and/or prepared using prescribed methods and procedures.
The choice of the many methods for collecting fishery data will depend on the variables to be measured, the source and the resources available. In many cases, there is a natural way to collect particular variables. For example, relatively static variables, like vessel length or engine size, are often best collected through a registration system. Highly dynamic variables, like catch or effort, may often be best obtained through daily records, such as logsheets.
For the same variable, the methods can be different depending on the type of fishery. For example, for a large-scale fishery, catch data would be best collected from logbooks, whilst in a small-scale fishery interviews and/or questionnaires would often be the best method. The sources (fishers, processors etc.) are also an important factor for the choice and design of methods. Buyers, processors and other intermediaries are likely to keep their own sales records, which should be used as the basis of data forms. Small-scale fishers often do not keep any records, and data acquisition in this case would be restricted to one-to-one interviews, but the interview structure could be more flexible.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Records and relevant data are kept of the precise location where the specimens were collected.
Wen dthe data is colekted the data needs to be kep saf in A FAEL AND FOR A LONG PERED OF TAM SO RIESOTS CN BE DON ON THAT DATA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Required environmental data is recorded using appropriate methods and equipment.
Registration: registers and licences are particularly valuable for complete enumeration, but are limited to variables that change slowly, such as numbers of fishing vessels and their characteristics.
• Questionnaires: forms which are completed and returned by respondents. An inexpensive method that is useful where literacy rates are high and respondents are co-operative.
• Interviews: forms which are completed through an interview with the respondent. More expensive than questionnaires, but they are better for more complex questions, low literacy or less co-operation.
• Direct observations: making direct measurements is the most accurate method for many variables, such as catch, but is often expensive. Many methods, such as observer programmes, are limited to industrial fisheries.
• Reporting: the main alternative to making direct measurements is to require fishers and others to report their activities. Reporting requires literacy and co-operation, but can be backed up by a legal requirement and direct measurements.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Tree diameter, prevailing weather condition, and photographs taken.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
A review is given of what constitutes ethical collecting practices.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Live specimens are released in area of origin where transportation and additional data collection is not required. Wen that happens seten permieson and dokoments needs to be werievad and it mast be aproefed first befor that can happen.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Package specimens safely for transportation.
Wen you need to Package specimens safely for transportation you need to weriefay wat metord is gone be used and if that metord is safe for the animal or not.
SPESEMENTS
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Required specimens are collected; data obtained and/or prepared using prescribed methods and procedures.
The choice of the many methods for collecting fishery data will depend on the variables to be measured, the source and the resources available. In many cases, there is a natural way to collect particular variables. For example, relatively static variables, like vessel length or engine size, are often best collected through a registration system. Highly dynamic variables, like catch or effort, may often be best obtained through daily records, such as logsheets.
For the same variable, the methods can be different depending on the type of fishery. For example, for a large-scale fishery, catch data would be best collected from logbooks, whilst in a small-scale fishery interviews and/or questionnaires would often be the best method. The sources (fishers, processors etc.) are also an important factor for the choice and design of methods. Buyers, processors and other intermediaries are likely to keep their own sales records, which should be used as the basis of data forms. Small-scale fishers often do not keep any records, and data acquisition in this case would be restricted to one-to-one interviews, but the interview structure could be more flexible.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Records and relevant data are kept of the precise location where the specimens were collected.
Wen dthe data is colekted the data needs to be kep saf in A FAEL AND FOR A LONG PERED OF TAM SO RIESOTS CN BE DON ON THAT DATA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Required environmental data is recorded using appropriate methods and equipment.
Registration: registers and licences are particularly valuable for complete enumeration, but are limited to variables that change slowly, such as numbers of fishing vessels and their characteristics.
• Questionnaires: forms which are completed and returned by respondents. An inexpensive method that is useful where literacy rates are high and respondents are co-operative.
• Interviews: forms which are completed through an interview with the respondent. More expensive than questionnaires, but they are better for more complex questions, low literacy or less co-operation.
• Direct observations: making direct measurements is the most accurate method for many variables, such as catch, but is often expensive. Many methods, such as observer programmes, are limited to industrial fisheries.
• Reporting: the main alternative to making direct measurements is to require fishers and others to report their activities. Reporting requires literacy and co-operation, but can be backed up by a legal requirement and direct measurements.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Tree diameter, prevailing weather condition, and photographs taken.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
A review is given of what constitutes ethical collecting practices.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Live specimens are released in area of origin where transportation and additional data collection is not required. Wen that happens seten permieson and dokoments needs to be werievad and it mast be aproefed first befor that can happen.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Package specimens safely for transportation.
Wen you need to Package specimens safely for transportation you need to weriefay wat metord is gone be used and if that metord is safe for the animal or not.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Required specimens are collected; data obtained and/or prepared using prescribed methods and procedures.
The choice of the many methods for collecting fishery data will depend on the variables to be measured, the source and the resources available. In many cases, there is a natural way to collect particular variables. For example, relatively static variables, like vessel length or engine size, are often best collected through a registration system. Highly dynamic variables, like catch or effort, may often be best obtained through daily records, such as logsheets.
For the same variable, the methods can be different depending on the type of fishery. For example, for a large-scale fishery, catch data would be best collected from logbooks, whilst in a small-scale fishery interviews and/or questionnaires would often be the best method. The sources (fishers, processors etc.) are also an important factor for the choice and design of methods. Buyers, processors and other intermediaries are likely to keep their own sales records, which should be used as the basis of data forms. Small-scale fishers often do not keep any records, and data acquisition in this case would be restricted to one-to-one interviews, but the interview structure could be more flexible.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Records and relevant data are kept of the precise location where the specimens were collected.
Wen dthe data is colekted the data needs to be kep saf in A FAEL AND FOR A LONG PERED OF TAM SO RIESOTS CN BE DON ON THAT DATA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Required environmental data is recorded using appropriate methods and equipment.
Registration: registers and licences are particularly valuable for complete enumeration, but are limited to variables that change slowly, such as numbers of fishing vessels and their characteristics.
• Questionnaires: forms which are completed and returned by respondents. An inexpensive method that is useful where literacy rates are high and respondents are co-operative.
• Interviews: forms which are completed through an interview with the respondent. More expensive than questionnaires, but they are better for more complex questions, low literacy or less co-operation.
• Direct observations: making direct measurements is the most accurate method for many variables, such as catch, but is often expensive. Many methods, such as observer programmes, are limited to industrial fisheries.
• Reporting: the main alternative to making direct measurements is to require fishers and others to report their activities. Reporting requires literacy and co-operation, but can be backed up by a legal requirement and direct measurements.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Tree diameter, prevailing weather condition, and photographs taken.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
A review is given of what constitutes ethical collecting practices.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Live specimens are released in area of origin where transportation and additional data collection is not required. Wen that happens seten permieson and dokoments needs to be werievad and it mast be aproefed first befor that can happen.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Package specimens safely for transportation.
Wen you need to Package specimens safely for transportation you need to weriefay wat metord is gone be used and if that metord is safe for the animal or not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)